Pages

02 July 2010

Short-waisted?

Several of you commented, in regard to the way you wear skirts, that you are short-waisted, which seems synonymous with high-waisted or having a short torso. So I began to wonder if I was short-waisted as well, and how this effects what we wear and how we alter what we sew.

In sewing patterns, I always assumed I had to take into account my small bust, since most are made with a B-cup in mind. I'd assume this meant the twins "pulled" up the fabric, and on me, with a smaller cup size, that resulted in a lower garment waist. It hadn't dawned on me that my waist may actually be shorter than average.

According to what I've read (here and here), you can tell you're short or long waisted if the underarm-waist:waist-bottom of bum and/or head-waist:waist-floor ratio is unequal.

So I used a yard-stick, since we're talking figure ratios and not curves. The first ratio is 9:12 and the second 23:40. So I am short-waisted!

Funny, I also measured the length from my natural waist to where I like my jean/trouser waistband, and it's 3-4 inches, just about halfway on my torso. Perhaps I've been unconsciously choosing items that balance my figure, even though I assumed they were "high waisted" because I can only find them in the Old Lady Section of the store (as my baby sister calls it), on the one rack labeled, "Classic." [Am I the only one who finds the super-low slung jeans disturbing? They seem to intensify muffin-top and undies-flashing probability. I mean, if you need a Brazillian just to wear them, they're simply too low.]

From the Dummies.com site, here's a photo that emphasizes the short-waist in comparison:



And here's a visual depiction of a suggestion on how and why you should balance a short-waist:



I agree with those of you who say that these fashion-rules are made to be broken. I, however, am finding that I'm approaching style the way I learned to cook. I begin with a recipe and, once I understand the basics, experiment freely from there. So, first, what's the recipe to make a short-waisted woman look proportional?

The idea is to visually lower the waistline and to lessen all that leg. These suggestions vary widely, but they include: Opting for a lower waistline in bottoms, untucked shirts and/or sweaters and jackets that fall at the hip. Sounds like contemporary, casual fashion to me. And maybe in that way we're lucky.

Yet, for those of us who are interested in retro styles, this brings up a problem. Most styles, I'm thinking the 40s and the 50s specifically, highlight the natural waist. But on a short-waisted woman, that line is closer to the bust, conceivably making her look out of proportion.

So, what do you do? If you're short-waisted, how do you accommodate it? When you sew, do you shorten the torso to your natural waist or do you let the waist linger lower creating a visual balance? (In some styles, though, wouldn't you want to show off all that tres feminine hip?)

To complicate matters, a short-waist is only one issue. In my last post, I focused on trying to find clothes that flatter my square-shape frame. So I throw in a small bust and a short-waist to the mix, each with different and sometimes conflicting suggestions, i.e. a square-shaped gal should wear big, clunky belts to emphasize the waist but a short-waist gal should avoid them at all costs.

I suppose this is what makes fashion—and all the control we have over it through sewing—such a fun journey. We need a little playfulness to find a style that works on our unique bodies (Toria wrote a wonderful post on the topic here). My full skirt, for example, may be a no-no with a short-waist but I'd like to think that the fullness hides the bottom of my torso, leaving me leggy (which I like!). That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it.

But I'd love to know: What works for you?

:)

10 comments:

  1. Interesting, Ali, I have never really understood the definitions before. Your explanation, along with the examples given are very helpful. Thanks! I focus my clothing choices toward what enhances my hourglass shape and hides any fluff. :-) But I see now that choosing a correct trouser style is important to balance my proportions. Here are my numbers---pit:waist and waist:bum is 10:10
    and head:waist and waist:floor is 24:38.
    The numbers seemes odd but I did them three times, and then added up the larger ones. I am 5"2" on a good day so that's correct.

    I usually sew blouses with waist definition and peplums, wrap dresses or tunics, and fitted tops. I have a tummy so pants with flat fronts work best-and those look good a little below my natural waist. I don't wear shirts tucked in so the waist placement is only for comfort.

    I am interested in what others find.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's so interesting that you just posted about this, as we were just having this discussion a couple of days ago! I am definitely short waisted if you go "by the books" but I'm also heavy and if I use my actual waist it looks like my bum is half way up my back! Not a pretty site.... So I opt for low waisted everything and wear tank tops tucked in to avoid unnecessary "whale tailing." I say rules are definitely made to be broken, and you should wear what makes you feel good. When you feel good about yourself you look better, no matter what! Anyway... interesting post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to agree with your opinion on your full skirt. To me I don't think 'oh my god she's got no torso!' I think 'what a fab pair of legs'. It's all smoke and mirrors, disguise a problem and highlight something you love. Figuring out what those things are and how to do it is the biggest problem I have!

    I've just written a follow up post in response to your comments and this post but essentially I wear hipster jeans (not the really low cut kind that you fall out of though) and long, airy tops. And I'm so bored with it! Hence the full tilt run into vintage in an effort to find something a little more .... snazzy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fellow short-waisted, small-busted rectangle, here :). I've been avoiding high waistbands since highschool; I like my pants and skirts low-slung and my dresses either drop-waisted or empire waisted. I've never much cared for the "waist-cinching" idea, although that might be as much anti-eighties conditioned response as anything else. However, sewing (which would allow me to correctly fit stuff to my waist, which is a good 2-3 sizes larger than my bust and hips) has given me the opportunity to at least *think* about stretching beyond some of my fashion "rules". How far beyond... I'm not sure yet. Good luck with your continued experiments! Maybe I'll be trying some of my own soon... :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Ali, fasinating post. I'm trying to work out what body shape i am. According to one source i'm a pear then in another i'm an hourglass. Apparently i should be wearing more fitted items but i love loose flowing things. Maybe i should try making some semi-fitted items and see how i go xx

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your comments ladies! I definitely think we should all wear what makes us most confident and it's fascinating to hear where you're coming from, as I'm just starting out on this journey. :)

    I personally like a lot of leg, so it's just the high waist on the torso that I'm aware of. Before the summer's over, I think I should try and sew one drop-waist skirt, but I'm concerned: Does it shift about? That was always why I never wore them, they tended to shimmy up to my waist anyway. But who knows if those RTW skirts fit right, and whether I can make something work sewing-wise (add a belt, etc).

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think I am short waisted and I measure 36, 32, 37. I am not sure what that makes me. I have short legs so I tend to get swamped by big baggy trousers. I have found my body shape has changed in the last few years since having a second child, and I still haven't quite figured out how to dress this new body shape of mine!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh yes, this is me. It's hard to carve out a defined waistline when your ribcage is practically right on top of your pelvis! I actually have a small-ish waist, but then my shape takes a very sudden curve from there out to my hips. Definitely a fitting challenge.

    I've been so attracted to all the cute high-waisted skirts people have been posting on their sewing blogs lately, but I'm scared to try one because I'm afraid it will make my torso look non-existent.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And I know I'm long-waisted with short legs, which is why the full, high skirts work for me. Hip-slung skirts make my legs look stubby (and yes, they shift around.. but I thought that was just because I have wide hips and larger thighs, so the skirt shifts up to escape the larger areas...)
    I'll wear both, because I don't like to be limited to just one style, but I do notice the difference.
    Fascinating to analyze ourselves like this!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Glad you posted about this, as it is a problem most women have and yet don't know and when you're sewing it is a big fat problem.
    If you're big-busted like I am and short-waisted it makes things very complicated when high-waisted garments come into play. If a waistband is too tall or a belt is much too wide everything looks wrong. I can also slip into the land of what my sister calls "The Pants Up Club" (http://images.allmoviephoto.com/2005_Second_City_TV_Volume_4/2005_second_city_tv_volume_4_002.jpg).
    However, if the skirt is the right length I feel the high-waisted look can be very flattering even if it makes you look short all over. High-waisted short shorts should generally be avoided.

    ReplyDelete